- Join our
Facebook group - Follow us on
Twitter - Join our
Delicious network - Discuss with us on
Yahoo!
Groups - Get help in
our wiki - Subscribe using
RSS - Keep InTouch
with Members
News from trusts
Agents call for place on the FA Council - Supporters choke on their cornflakes
"Agents perform a valuable role. We should be acknowledged as stakeholders in the game. The AFA has more than 300 members* and I believe we should have a place on the FA council so that we can make a contribution, and other parts of the game can hear our voice directly."
That's a quote from Mel Stein, Chairman of the Association of Football Agents. He could have said something really spurious like "We bring a valuable level of investment into the game through our work with players; without it, we wouldn't see the best players in the English game, TV wouldn't be as interested and we wouldn't get the investment."
*By our calculation, if agents get one representative for their 300, then per-head, SD's and the FSF's membership should entitle supporters to around 3,000 representatives. Now all we need to do is find a room big enough.
Now, what do you think? Do you think they deserve to be represented in the governing structures of the game, or are they merely people who profit greatly for saying "My player wants a transfer/payrise/loyalty bonus"?
No doubt I've insulted a very small proportion of agents who might do rather more than that, so sorry if I have. But the serious point is that if they need to be represented in the game, don't others? Groundsmen for example? Look at their case: They perform a valuable role and their professional association (which in this case really is a professional association), the Institute of Groundsmanship, has 12168 more members than the AFA. Couldn't they bring something valuable to the Council and to the governing structures given their very direct involvement in the game?
Truth is, the case for having agents represented in the governing structures of football appears about as compelling as having the Institute of Groundsmen represented, and Mel Stein is going to have to do a better job than that to convince a cynical football going public that they do. Unless of course the FA care to adopt our proportional approach to representation. You know the number.
« back | ^ top
Events
Board Member Development - London
Chairperson Training - Livingston
Board Members Development - Cardiff
SD Rugby League Conference
SD Rugby League Challenge Cup
Talking Tactics - Hamilton
Board Member Development - York
Board Member Development - Nottingham
Talking Tactics - East Scotland
Board Member Development - Bristol
Board member Development - Manchester
Secretary Development - Glasgow
Talking Tactics - Stirling
What we're reading
If you want to access an individual reading list, or view or join our network, you can do it here


Comments
Be the first to comment on this item.
Leave a comment